Sunday, June 29, 2014

Coming Soon to Denver: Traditional Carmelite Monastery!!! :)

This Sunday I was more than excited to find out that the Carmelite brother from brazil who has been attending Mass at our parish for the past few weeks is here working with our parish to find a location in the Denver area to start a Traditional Carmelite Monastery (The Brothers and Sisters Hermits of the Virgin Mary of Mount Carmel)! How exciting is that?! :) 


  

While checking out their website I found some beautiful words spoken about the traditional liturgy that I just had to share. :) 


"As the Church teaches, the Liturgy is the Prayer of Christ.  The Church is born from the Liturgy, as from the side of Christ pierced as He prays on the Cross and commends Himself to the Father for our Salvation as our High Priest.  The Liturgy is the heart of our life as Christians, for it in Christ Our Head acts in and for His Body and Bride, the Church.  The Mystery of God, into which we are incorporated by the Sacraments, is the living Source and absolute Summit of the life of each soul.  All discipline, prayer, sacrifices, penance, study, and work exist for the sake of discovery and living reception of and saving transformation in the Mystery of Christ, to which we have real, efficacious access through the Sacraments and Liturgy of the Church. 

The Carmelite life is oriented toward the reception and fruition of divine, eternal life, which is the Mystery of Christ in the soul.  “To them God chose to make known how great among the Gentiles are the riches of the glory of this mystery, which is Christ in you, the hope of glory” (Colossians 1:27).  The Mystery of God given to us in Christ is the union of God and Man which Christ is  in the unity of His Person. "Abide in me and I in you.  He who eats my Flesh and drinks my Blood abides in me, and  I in him.  As the living Father Sent me and I live because of the Father, so he who eats Me will live because of Me!" (John 15:4; 6:56-57). 


Through the Holy Sacrifice of our great High Priest and divine Head, we pass beyond the veil and enter Heaven, even while we remain on earth.  Furthermore, we bear in our souls Heaven: the dwelling of the God who gives Himself to us in Christ and His Spirit as he draws us to Himself and His Glory.  Henceforth we live by the life of God, in the eternal, infinite Love that unites the Father and Son and which is their Life and Glory.  We receive that Life through the eternal Sacrifice of Christ perpetuated in the Mass.  The Cross of Christ, through which this Life is given to fallen mankind, dead in its sin, is our glory, and we seek to reverently and devoutly celebrate that eternal Liturgy in Holy Mass and in the Divine Office and then live that Mystery in our souls in our prayer, study, work, and service...until the day we too finally pass through the veil of death and enter the Light of Christ's immortal Glory."




Check out their website to learn more about their beautiful charism and devotion to our Lord in the Eucharist! :) 
http://www.eremitaecarmeli.org/


"God Himself teaches us to go forth with our hand in His by means of the Church's liturgy." - Saint Teresa Benedicta of the Cross


Wednesday, May 14, 2014

EWTN's TV series "Extraordinary Faith" Episode 1

Below is the link for the EWTN's TV series "Extraordinary Faith" Episode 1.

During this episode they reveal some of the beautiful parishes in the LA area that are celebrating the Traditional Latin Mass and exploding from the seams. They also talk with various people on why they attend that Mass as well as some interesting Latin Mass organizations that are helping to train priests, altar servers, and musicians in order to help start the Latin Mass back up again in YOUR parish.

Hope you enjoy! :)

http://vimeo.com/63988205


Wednesday, April 30, 2014

We are all very little at the foot of the Cross, and yet what the world judges to be a "barrier" to participation is in fact precisely what we need nowadays to draw close to the throne of saving grace.

The Timeless Draw Of The Traditional Latin Mass.
By Fr. Calvin Goodwin, FSSP.

I recently read an article on the influence that current media has on young people. The import of the article was that most young people today have their eyes (and attention) divided at any given moment among their Playstation, their cell phone, and the Internet. Hence the phenomenon amongst young people today - which any longtime teacher can testify to - of the "shrinking span of attention". So what has common perception to do with the Traditional Rite of holy Mass?

Well, when Pope Benedict XVI, in Summorum Pontificum, informed the Catholic world that the Traditional Latin Mass had not in fact been banned after the last ecumenical council and that he wanted that form of Mass to become a common experience in ALL catholic churches, he also mentioned that his was not an exercise in religious nostalgia, but a sign of living growth in the Church - precisely because the "Latin Mass movement" had become a movement of the young. The question, then is: Why are young people drawn in such numbers to the Traditional Latin Mass?

One would have imagined that, with the attested shorter attention span, a Mass that is (a) in Latin, (b) celebrated with "the priest's back to the people," and (c) largely celebrated amidst long periods of silent prayer, would have been exactly what young people would NOT want. But to conclude thus would only be repeating a common error of out time - to think that the Mass must "appeal" to us, and if it doesn't, then we must reshape it so that it will do so.

But what IS the Mass? It is the re-presentation upon the altar, in an unbloody manner, of the Sacrifice of Calvary. This sacrifice of Christ does not need to be made "relevant" to us - we need to conform ourselves to it! And it is a testimony to the truth of this principle that God is leading young people, in large numbers, to the Mass that makes Sacrifice clearly and specifically present.

The Mass, as celebrated since ancient times in the Catholic Church, draws us out of our everyday experience. The Fathers of the Church used to say that it is not even so much that at the Consecration Our Lord comes down upon the altar as that he draws us upwards to the realm where He dwells in everlasting glory. There, at Mass, we all - young and old - are the ones about whom Our Lord said, "Let the little ones come to me and do not hinder them." (Mk 10:14) We are all very little at the foot of the Cross, and yet what the world judges to be a "barrier" to participation is in fact precisely what we need nowadays to draw close to the throne of saving grace. 

A sacramental building??? huh???

An other article. This one written by our wise and humble pastor. :) My favorite article on the subject thus far. I never thought about the church building being sacramental! Mind blown! :)

Church Architecture
By FR. James Jackson, FSSP.

From the earliest days, the Church has been zealous for the building in which God is worshipped, and the reason is intimately connected with the liturgy. For we need eyes to see God as both the Fountain of beauty in this life and the Fountain of holiness in the next.

Unfortunately, cultivating such vision is difficult in our times, when most of what our world is producing is surpassingly uninspiring and even ugly, and this banality has extended even to Church architecture. In contrast to this modern tendency, we have Beseleel and Ooliab, the architects of the first tabernacle, who were "filled with the spirit of God in wisdom, and in understanding, and n knowledge, and in all manner of workmanship, to devise cunning works, to work in gold, and in silver and in brass, and in cutting of stones to set them, and in carving of timber." (ex. 31:3-5) When the first tabernacle was built, there was no effort to pander to the whims of the architect's profession or of a church committee!

Sacramentality is the feature that distinguishes traditional ecclesiastical architecture from the modernist architecture of our times. By the outward and visible form is signified something inward and spiritual. Mere reality is not sufficient, for what can be more real than a pyramid - and less Christian? In a parallel universe, many would desire that the words of our Lord to be plain, unadorned and simple. But the words of Christ were in fact parabolic, figurative, descriptive, and allegorical; just so the church building ought to imitate her Master.

Church architecture should thus itself be sacramental, a material fabric which figures the purpose for which it was designed. The distinction between a contemporary church (which might look like a mall or some prop from Star Wars) and the traditional church is not found simply in an association of ideas, correctness of detail, mechanical construction, or in quaintness, but in sacramentality. Remember the definition of a sacrament from the catechism: "A sacrament is an outward sign instituted by Christ to give santifying grace." So the church building should be sacramental, an outward sign of what is really happening inside it, and above all what should be happening in the soul.


Fumbling through the '62: "Sacred Music in the Life of the Parish."

Another article that I talked about in the last '62 post. :)

La LaALaLaALalalalalaaaaaaaa!!! :)

Hope you enjoy! :)

"Sacred Music In The Life Of The Parish" 
By Fr. Gerard Saguto, FSSP.

Music has played a significant role in humanity throughout history. From our earliest years, we were soothed by lullabies, the "alphabet song" taught us our ABC's and "Do, RE, Mi" helped us learn to sing. Music actively affects our ability to work, relax, study, or pray-for better or worse. It is intuitively clear that music is formative and thus has an effect upon our souls: It either builds virtue or promotes vice, based on the type and amount that is listened to. 

The selection of music used in sacred worship is therefore of great importance because it will profoundly influence our perception of sacred and of morality. Accordingly, music accompanying befitting worship of God must convey holiness, mystery, and goodness. This precept serves to ensure, safeguard, and transmit a proper understanding of God, so we may render what is due to Him. Man owes to God that which is highest and most beautiful, and so the rites and music employed in public worship must reflect this dignity.

As the majority of our formal worship of GOd takes place at a parish level, it is of great importance that the parish promote the sacred tradition of the Church's liturgical music. Such promotion includes Gregorian chant, polyphony, hymnody, and simpler compositions that bear resemblance to these. The parish today must also be a bright beacon of light, a sign of contraction and a haven for hungry souls in an ever-secularizing world. This mission is carried out first and foremost by the outward expression of its worship of God. For reason, the Missa Solemnis or Missa Cantata should have a prominent and regular place in the liturgical schedule of the parish. The regularity of these more solemn forms of worship will make sacred music normative for the faithful, and whatever is normative becomes formative.

The realization of this ideal requires dedication and hard work, both for the choir and for the pastor. A pastor's active support of sacred music is indispensable towards the presence of good music in the parish for years to come. The sacred music of the Church truly is a treasury and an instrument to holiness: Let us pray for its universal restoration in our churches. 

Fumbling through the '62: "The Full Catholic Life of an Apostolate."

So life has been beyond crazy and while the hubby and I have had a million and one things that we can write on and would like to write on we have yet to finish one and post it. Until that free time comes (**Cross your fingers** jaja) I am going to try to post some articles that where published in a catholic magazine that we came across on the Priestly Fraternity of St. Peter of which our parish is apart of. One of the articles I was surprised to see was written by our extremely humble and wise priest here... surprise, surprise he didn't tell anyone. jaja.

Anywhooo, here is one of the articles. I hope you read it with an open and prayerful heart. :)

(my additional comments are in red. Feel free to skip over them. jaja. :P )


The Full Catholic Life of an Apostolate. 
By Fr. Paul Jared McCambridge, FSSP

Among those of all ages and walks of life who choose to attend the Traditional Latin Mass, you will find some that always know and loved it. Some found it as a refuge from liturgical abuse they had experienced(X marks the spot for this girl), while still others sought it out as being an inherently beautiful and fitting form of worship (the reason I personally continue to attend).

Regardless, “traditional Catholicism” means far more than simply assisting at Mass in the ancient rite. Those who arrive at the Priestly Fraternity of St. Peter often remark that they were attracted to the “full parish life” in our apostolates. While liturgy and the sacraments come foremost (<-- Beautifully awesome to see this lived out in a parish! Its not about the million and one groups that seems to be offered at many parishes which are great and all, but rather is about Christ Himself humbling Himself to be present in the Eucharist that should be the center of the parish life. All other things should permeate from that.), there is also a great deal more.

These Catholics want real distinction between “the world” and the environment in which they and their families lives. They seek to be among Catholics who are one, not just in belief, but in the way they manifest the Faith and live it daily. The traditional Liturgy provides a welcome antidote to the imagery and noise of modern media and “pop” culture through the ordered dignity of the ceremonies, the interplay of sacred music and silence, and the profundity of the prayers themselves. These foster the love of true beauty in art, music, and literature- and ultimately, the desire for all one’s life to be consistent with it.

In a culture contemptuous of the wisdom of the past, the apostolate provides a profound love and reverence for the Tradition of Faith. It deepens ones faith and spirituality by offering retreats and days of recollection, providing the fertile ground for one’s faith to grow, along with the hope and love of God. Members seeking to be ever more closely integrated into the Mystical Body of Christ form strong friendships within the community upon the solid foundation they hold in common.

While the modern world rejects the sanctity of human life and the ideas of marriage and the family as God created them, an apostolate of the Fraternity attracts those who cherish life and the traditional family. The presence of many large families within them testifies to this. The doctrinal and substantive preaching they hear from well-formed priest helps their families flourish in knowledge and love of God. (Check. I have heard some of the best homilies in my life at this parish. no fluff. no shying away from important things. Each homily you get catechized. Nothing watered down. Each homily building you closer and closer to a fuller knowledge of Christ and the faith of His church and then calling you out to put that faith into action. By the time it is time to receive our Lord I feel like I am fighting back tears with the love and awe that has been laid in my lap. Okay I'm ranting...sorryyy. :P)

However the initial attraction to the Traditional Latin Mass comes about, those who experience it regularly come to desire its spirituality to permeate their lives. The Priestly Fraternity of St. Peter seeks to facilitate this integrity through its apostolates. 


Wednesday, March 26, 2014

Fatherhood: A Lesson from the Abbey


Saint Benedict of Nursia provided a Rule that was made for monks to find holiness in leading a life that the Gospels call for. Saint Benedict established a system that was meant to be lived within an abbey. The abbey is a place of solitude, prayer, soul-searching, and finding God. I believe that most of The Rule can be applied to everyday living, but his call “[t]o obey the commands of the Abbot in all things, even though he himself (which Heaven forbid) act otherwise, mindful of that precept of the Lord: "What they say, do ye; what they do, do ye not" (Mt 23:3)”1 seems to share a distinct relationship with a father in a household. Thus, I believe that the practice of this particular rule could lead to exponential growth of the virtues obedience and humility for all the persons within the household, including the father.

First, it is appropriate to analyze Benedict's Rule from its foundation: Sacred Scripture. Saint Benedict references the Gospel of Matthew to form this rule. The passage reads:

Then Jesus said to the crowds and the disciples, 'The scribes and the Pharisees sit on Moses' seat; so practice and observe whatever they tell you, but not what they do; for they preach, but do not practice. They bind heavy burdens, hard to bear, and lay them on men's shoulders; but they themselves will not move them with their finger. They do all their deeds to be seen by men; for they make their phylacteries broad and their fringes long, and they love the place of honor at feasts and the best seats in the synagogues, and salutations in the market places, and being called rabbi by men. But you are not to be called rabbi, for you have one teacher, and you are all brethren. And call no man your father on earth, for you have one Father, who is in heaven. Neither be called masters, for you have one master, the Christ. He who is greatest among you shall be your servant; whoever exalts himself will be humbled, and whoever humbles himself will be exalted (Mt. 23:1-12, RSV).



With the Scripture as background to The Rule, it is clearly seen that this calls the onlookers to obedience and humility. The portion of the Gospel points to respect for the authority established by God in covenant with Israel and the Davidic Kingdom. This establishment moves the disciples towards an understanding of Christ's earlier message: a call to the Kingdom of God. This Kingdom, not being of this world but other-worldly, pushes the Christian to a new-found way of life.

Jesus stresses that the Pharisees must be respected despite their lack of piety and practice. Jesus, acknowledging that all the Pharisaical actions are for show, demonstrates respect is due to the Pharisees despite not listening to the call of the Lord. This manifests itself in the abbey by mirroring the respect given to the old authority of 'Moses' seat'2 to the new authority of the Church through the Apostles and those who give up all things and secure for themselves a place in Heaven (cf. Mt. 19:28-30). Thus, Saint Benedict calls for an Abbot who “hates his own will,”3 as stated in the rule prior to this examined rule. This Abbot, therefore, follows a will not of his own, but rather through his prayer-life follows the Divine Will.

The relationship of the Abbot to the brothers is one of leadership whilst the God-Man does not reside with them. It is fully acknowledged that the Abbot is safeguarding their well-being spiritually and physically, and stands as the head of the community, but remains a part of the greater Church and is subject to the Lord. This prompts the motion from religious life to what is not called religious life, but very much is religious life: the domestic church. During the reign of Blessed John Paul II, the Holy Father issued the Apostolic Exhortation Familiaris Consortio. In this work, Blessed John Paul II examines the call of the family to holiness and defines the role of the Christian family: “Accordingly, the family must go back to the "beginning" of God's creative act, if it is to attain self-knowledge and self-realization in accordance with the inner truth not only of what it is but also of what it does in history. And since in God's plan it has been established as an "intimate community of life and love,"(44) the family has the mission to become more and more what it is, that is to say, a community of life and love, in an effort that will find fulfillment, as will everything created and redeemed, in the Kingdom of God. Looking at it in such a way as to reach its very roots, we must say that the essence and role of the family are in the final analysis specified by love. Hence the family has the mission to guard, reveal and communicate love, and this is a living reflection of and a real sharing in God's love for humanity and the love of Christ the Lord for the Church His bride.”4

Very much like the abbey, the family is a place where souls can learn about, find, and experience love. The love that is given is not solely of the individuals within the walls, but from the Creator Who causes all things and gives the love to be given (cf. 1 Jn 4:12-17). Thus, the brother in a religious family loves analogously to the sibling. Providentially, the Lord entrusts His children to other children of the Kingdom. It is the parental responsibility to “form a community of persons, serve life, participate in the development of society, and share in the life and mission of the Church.”5 Thus, with analogous community structures, it can be seen that the father is responsible to guard his wife and children as an Abbot guards his community spiritually and physically (cf. Ephesians 5:21-33).

With the given structure, the father must act with great humility and obedience understanding that he is meant to be the spiritual leader of his home. As spelled out in Saint Paul's letter to the Ephesians, the couple must be “subject to one another out of reverence for Christ,” and the Scripture goes on to explain how the husband is “the head of the wife as Christ is the head of the Church, his body, and is himself its Savior” (Eph 5:21-23). Thus, the father of the household, like Christ, is responsible for the salvation of his family, just as the Church is a family under the head of Christ. Therefore, the father is called to develop character in the areas of humility and obedience: listening to the Will of God and humbly acting out what he believes the Lord is leading his house to do in all things. Saint Joseph serves as a very good example of trusting in physical and spiritual matters that may be referenced as a barometer of prudence (cf. Mt 2:13-23).

As stated previously, the Lord has entrusted this man with the care of the family and ought to be considerate of all the opinions and weigh the spiritual and physical ramifications. Progressively, this structure allows for growth in obedience and humility for the mother and children. The blind assent to the father's prayer-life and union with the Father, trusting in his prudence, while also respectfully indicating feelings about decisions, is important and vital to the father's role as executor and is instrumental to the growth of humility and obedience for all parties. With these things in mind, communication and consequently unified action within the household serves to be a union of hearts, minds, and will that is on the level of supernatural.

Lastly, the rule indicates that the community must do as the teachings, in union with good conscience, call to. Thus, a father, like the Abbot who “[fulfills] daily the commandments of God by works,”6 must do the same in order that he leads not by commands but rather by actions and example. This shows that the actions flow from the head of the family. It is the call of the leader of the household, like the Abbot, to silently, yet resiliently carry his cross with a Christ-like habit that allows for an example for children and serves as a motivator for his wife. This is done by sanctifying the work day, whether it be schoolwork, physical labor, prayer, etc. All things must be renewed in Christ to move the Kingdom of God out into the darkness of the secular world and brighten the world to become a world both of God and Man coinciding.

Therefore, Saint Benedict's Rule can be for all. Saint Benedict established a system that was meant to be lived within an abbey, but finds itself amplifying daily life of even the domestic church. The household can become the place of solitude, prayer, soul-searching, and finding God as it is called to be. With The Rule applied to everyday living, the call “[t]o obey the commands of the [father] in all things, even though he himself (which Heaven forbid) act otherwise, mindful of that precept of the Lord: "What they say, do ye; what they do, do ye not" (Mt 23:3)”7 leads a household to Heaven and brings the Kingdom of God evermore to earth. Thus, with a society desperately in need of a witness, the practice of this particular rule will lead to exponential growth of the virtues obedience and humility for all the persons within the household, and possibly serve to inspire others to take up their cross and follow the Lord in all things and all states of life.

1 St. Benedict of Nursia. "The Holy Rule of Saint Benedict." http://www.documentacatholicaomnia.eu/03d/0480-0547,_Benedictus_Nursinus,_Regola,_EN.pdf (accessed February 21, 2014).

2 Ibid.

3 Ibid.

4 Blessed John Paul II. “APOSTOLIC EXHORTATION FAMILIARIS CONSORTIO.” http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/apost_exhortations/documents/hf_jp-familiaris-consortio-_en.html (accessed March 13, 2014).

5 Ibid.

6 St. Benedict of Nursia. "The Holy Rule of Saint Benedict." http://www.documentacatholicaomnia.eu/03d/0480-0547,_Benedictus_Nursinus,_Regola,_EN.pdf (accessed February 21, 2014).

7 Ibid.

TRADITION OF THE ELDERS OR TRADITION OF GOD?


During Jesus' ministry, Christ encounters many challenges from the scribes and Pharisees. Blatant attacks against His teachings and followers all attempt to move people from considering following Him to focusing on following the Pharisees and the scribes from their comfortable positions atop the Judaic hierarchy. One of the many instances of this blatant abuse of power and influence is found at the beginning of the fifteenth chapter of the Gospel of Matthew where the Pharisees question Jesus in regard to why Jesus' “disciples transgress the tradition of the elders? For they do not wash their hands when they eat” (Mt 15:2, RSV). Jesus is about to use this moment to teach a lesson that forever changes the understanding of the Law and how it is to be cared for.

[15:1] “Then Pharisees and scribes came to Jesus from Jerusalem [...]” From its beginnings, the evangelist wishes for us to understand the setting of our location, for it has a significance. In the previous chapter, Jesus arrives at Gennesaret, which is located on the “northwest shore on the Sea of Galilee.”1 Many gathered after His arrival, and the people brought all who were diseased and needed to be healed. These were not the only to arrive to visit Our Lord and hear His words. The mention of the location points to the Pharisees went out of their way to pay Him a visit: they made a point to come all the way from Jerusalem, a long journey, which is estimated to be sixty miles away.

[15:2] After arriving the evangelist wastes no time in showing how the Pharisees and scribes have come to question and dampen this mission. Immediately they ask, “Why do your disciples transgress the tradition of the elders? For they do not wash their hands when they eat” (Mt 15:2). It is important to note that “[t]he Pharisees, as a heightened expression of piety, applied this priestly standard of purity to all Israel, requiring even laypeople throughout the land to cleans their hands before taking a meal.”2 Simply put, this is an extra law. A law that is not from God, but rather from man, which serves to be a rather big issue as the discussion unfolds. Nevertheless, the intellectual battle has begun, the leaders of Israel have questioned the author of the Law. Thus, the teacher, the Man Who speaks with Authority will begin to teach by questioning.

In regard to the subject of the precepts of the extraordinary laws, St. Thomas Aquinas had much to say. St. Thomas Aquinas wrote: “Deuteronomy 4, 2: 'You shall not add to the word that I speak to you, neither shall you take away from it.' Hence, by adding traditions, they were acting contrary to the Law; not because it was not allowed to make an ordinance, but because they were ordering that their decrees be observed just like Lord's Law.”3 This has serious ramifications, when seen in its context, the Pharisees are adding “ordinances” that they are claiming to be equal to the Law of the Lord. If the Law of the Lord is held equal to the law of men serious ramifications will follow, because man and his understanding are not equal to that of God. Therefore, this is an early indicator that the Pharisees, in practice, lack the humility of fully understanding the Law from its heart and, therefore, cannot enforce and regulate its practice justly or prudently.

The Philosopher also sheds light on why the Apostles did not wash their hands: “It was because they were so preoccupied with the word of God that they did not even have time: hence, due to their preoccupation for spiritual things, they were not washing their hands in the manner that the Jews did, as it is stated in Mark 7, because all the Jews do not eat without often washing their hands: for that reason, the disciples were not washing their hands according to their ritual.”4 The Apostles were worrying about things more important than the external, the internal. With the serious focus, the Apostles ate the words of the Word, and were being purified by His Message. The Lord, by His Message, sanctifies those who hear and believe. Just as the Gospel of John states, “And from his fulness have we all received, grace upon grace. For the law was given through Moses: grace and truth came through Jesus Christ” (Jn 1:16-17).

[15:3] “And why do you transgress the commandment of God for the sake of tradition?” This practice of questioning is common amongst the rabbis of Jerusalem. The unlearned carpenter from Nazareth is utilizing their methods of discussion. Jesus is immediately showcasing His expertise, cunning, but, most importantly, His Authority over the Law.

[15:4] “For God commanded, 'Honor your father and your mother,' and, 'He who speaks evil of father or mother let him surely die.'” The Lord's words are very strong and are very familiar to the Pharisees and scribes because it is straight from the Scriptures they hold so dearly. Despite two clear lines distinctly being noted, Christ is referencing four different pieces of Scripture: Exodus 20:12, Deuteronomy 5:16, Exodus 21:17, and Leviticus 20:9. These four verses share the same basic idea, but must be looked at to understand the fullness of the Scriptural background. Exodus chapter twenty, verse twelve, commands honoring of mother and father in order “that your days may be long in the land which the LORD your God gives you” (Ex 20:12). This verse flows continuously from the original ideas found as early as Abraham that one who follows the ways of the Lord shall be blessed. Deuteronomy reiterates the main idea of the previous verse, while adding “and that it may go well with you, in the land which the LORD your God gives you” (Dt 5:16). The reiteration serves to remind the people of the seriousness and sacredness of these words, which do not come from man, but from YHWH. Additionally, this idea being mentioned in two books is no coincidence, and brings to mind the idea of a nation/Kingdom that had once been established and was anticipated to be reestablished by all in Israel. Recalling infidelity to the Law, Jesus calls further on the curses of not obeying the precepts. The Pharisees and scribes recall the lessons that when a man who breaks the covenant between God and His people will incur struggles and an end: death (cf. Ex 21:17). This is only furthered by a memory of “one who curses his father or his mother shall be put to death; he has cursed his father or his mother, his blood is upon him” (Lev 20:9). Leviticus is taking it further to recall that it is not permitted to work dark magic wishing the demise of their family. Thus, Jesus is calling the Pharisees and scribes out in regard to fidelity in both word and deed, and the bait has been hooked, with all eyes and ears attentively awaiting the next words.

With the suspense built, Jesus moves on to state, “But you say, 'If any one tells his father or his mother, What you would have gained from me is given to God, he need not honor his father'” (Mt 15:5). Jesus has drawn the intellectual sword and thrust it through the Pharisees and scribes' complacent guarding of the Law. Jesus is bearing witness to a teaching that the scribes passively promoted, “By dedicating his property to God, i.e., to the temple, a man could avoid having to help his parents, without actually giving up what he had. The scribes held such a vow to be valid without necessarily approving it” (Mt. 15:5, footnote). The Book of Proverbs, also, sheds a great deal of light on this matter stating: “He who robs his father or his mother and says, 'That is no transgression,' is the companion of a man who destroys” (Proverbs 28:24). This, clearly, is avoiding the fourth commandment. Simultaneously, the teaching shares a serious case of adverse selection and moral hazard on the part of the scribes and Pharisees. Of course, Jesus does not waste much time.

Jesus ushers in His closing remarks to the scribes and Pharisees before He teaches to the crowds and disciples saying, “So, for the sake of your tradition, you have made void the word of God” (Mt. 15:6). The beginning of the closing statement. An accusation from the Author of the Law has been issued. Christ indicates that the “word of God,” which can also be translated as “the law of God,” has been left, forgotten, and absconded by those who claim to hold it so dearly to their heart. The Catechism of the Catholic Church speaks to matters of the law by saying, “The perfect fulfillment of the Law could be the work of none but the divine legislator, born subject to the Law in the person of the Son. In Jesus, the Law no longer appears engraved on tables of stone but 'upon the heart' of the Servant who becomes 'a covenant to the people,' because he will faithfully bring forth justice.'”5 Thus, Jesus has the Law written on His Heart, and the Apostles have followed Him and trusted Him in all things. Therefore, the Apostles have followed the Law by following the Living Law, Christ.

Closing, Jesus points out how the Pharisees and scribes have fulfilled a prophecy in a way that no good Jew would want to. Jesus exclaims: “You hypocrites! Well did Isaiah prophesy of you when he said: 'This people honors me with their lips, but their heart is far from me; in vain do they worship me, teaching as doctrines the precepts of men'” (Mt 15:7-9). The term hypocrite, widely misunderstood, has a clear, precise, burn to it as Jesus shouts in passion. The Lord is declaring them to be “Men […] who entered into the theater, and had one personality and pretended to have another by using masks. Therefore, these men are hypocrites, who outwardly pretend to be something different than they are inwardly; hence, they were inwardly intending profit, and outwardly they were inducing men to offer gifts to God.”6 This bold assertion not only communicates a question of individual fidelity to the Law, but outright puts a question of whether or not their motives are really centered on God. Jesus is removing the darkness over the people's eyes and showing how the Pharisees and scribes are using a holy structure for personal gain. Which points to the heart of the problem that St. Thomas points out “the more greed there is, the less charity there is (cf. Jer 12:2).”7

As clearly seen, the prophecy is a message of the hypocrisy of the scribes' teaching about avoiding honoring one's father or mother, as well as taking the law into their own hands. As a master of the word, He points out that their words mean nothing, as stated in earlier pieces of Scripture for they do not follow the precepts of the Lord, and their heart is not after YHWH's, but rather is after their own precepts: “the precepts of men.” By these laws, they claim their ordinances to be equal with that of God's. This calls to mind Job's admonition stating, “I will not level God with man” (Job 32:21). Later this is solidified in the Acts of the Apostles which states, “We ought to obey God rather than man” (Acts 5:29). Thus, their worship and all things, while not living the covenant, is in vain. As supported by the Book of Sirach, which states, “The Most High is not pleased with the offerings of the ungodly; and he is not propitiated for sins by a multitude of sacrifices” (Sir. 34:19).

N. T. Wright expounds on the idea of the heart saying, “Jesus, in the course of cryptically subverting the Jewish food laws, explains that what really matters is not physical substances that pass into someone's body, but thoughts and intentions that emerge from (what we would call) the personality. This distinction between outward act and attitude of heart was quite frequent in the Hebrew Bible, and there is no reason at all why Jesus should not have used the idea and indeed made it central to this part of his agenda [… This makes] him a good Jew, recognizing that YHWH desires to recreate human beings as wholes.”8 Therefore, Jesus' lesson stands as a proof of His position as an authority of the Scriptures. This moment serves as a very important moment between Christ, the Pharisees, and the scribes. The scribes and Pharisees traveled a long way to ask a question, which was intended to cause Christ's stumble, but rather led to the self-inflicted wound of hypocrisy.

This passage serves as a very serious and necessary reminder that precepts of the Lord must be learned, practiced, but truly lived. Christ looks for those who desire to find the truth in practicum, while also sharing a heart to know the Law. Ultimately, Christ is looking for disciples who are so caught up in Him and His message that they might forget to follow little practices, but are still at the feet of the Master consumed by His Life and willing to transform their lives to live like Christ. Of course, this is found in daily life. As N. T. Wright points out, the good Christian, like the good Jew must always be searching for holistic human growth, and not simply the outward appearance. Additionally, Christians must carefully examine their lives in regards to legalism and find a healthy balance of a true, Christian life of works amplified by love with integrity.

In regard to the Church teachings immediately relevant is the Church teaching on honoring our father and mother according to the fourth commandment. The Church teaches, “Adult children should give their parents material and moral support whenever they find themselves in situations of distress, sickness, loneliness, or old age.”9 Of course, when one practices living like Christ, Christ points towards caring for His mother, even at His death. Therefore, it is not something that is lost, but finds new life in a Christian's heart.

Thus, despite Christ's many challenges from the scribes and Pharisees, Jesus topples the oppositions' argument and, consequently, begins to establish His Authority as the Messiah. In the fifteenth chapter of the Gospel of Matthew where the Pharisees question Jesus in regard to why Jesus' “disciples transgress the tradition of the elders? For they do not wash their hands when they eat” (Mt 15:2, RSV). Jesus, in His Infinite Wisdom, transformed an attempted intellectual ambush into a moment of evangelization and a call to a conversion of heart. With the visit from the Pharisees and scribes, the Messiah not only spread His Message further, but also taught a oneness of heart, mind, and soul conformed to the precepts of the Lord and not of man. Thus, Christ teaches the purpose of the Law: the unity of the personal and Divine hearts, minds, and souls. Furthermore, Christ provides an example in the Apostles, who although may have been distracted away from the custom of washing the hands, were truly immersing themselves in the Word of God, which all are called to do.



































Bibliography Page



Aquinas, St. Thomas. Commentary on the Gospel of Saint Matthew. 2012. (accessed March 10, 2014).



Catechism of the Catholic Church. Washington, D.C.: Libreria Editrice Vaticana, (accessed January 20, 2014).



Compendium. Washington, D.C.: Libreria Editrice Vaticana, (accessed January 20, 2014).



Mitch, Curtis, and Edward Sri. The Gospel of Matthew. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2010. (accessed January 20, 2014).



Wright, N. T. Jesus and the Victory of God: Christian Origins and the Question of God, Volume 2. London: Great Britain Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge, 1996. (accessed January 20, 2014).

1Mitch, Curtis, and Edward Sri. The Gospel of Matthew. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2010. (accessed January 20, 2014).

2Ibid.

3Aquinas, St. Thomas. Commentary on the Gospel of Saint Matthew. 2012. (accessed March 10, 2014).

4Ibid.

5CCC, 580.

6Aquinas, St. Thomas. Commentary on the Gospel of Saint Matthew. 2012. (accessed March 10, 2014).

7Ibid.

8Wright, N. T. Jesus and the Victory of God: Christian Origins and the Question of God, Volume 2. London: Great Britain Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge, 1996. (accessed January 20, 2014).

9Compendium of the Catholic Church, 459.

Thursday, March 6, 2014

A Defense of the Most Holy Eucharist

In the modern world, Christians bicker about many things amongst themselves and others outside of the fold, but no other teaching of Jesus Christ sparks as much controversy as the “Bread of Life Discourse.” In multiple accounts of the Gospels and oral tradition, Jesus claims, “I am the living bread which came down from heaven; if any one eats of this bread, he will live for ever; and the bread which I shall give for the life of the world is my flesh” (John 6:51 RSV). This claim echoes in many of the disputes of denominations of Christianity. The question is tantamount to one's understanding of Christ. Thus, the defense of the Eucharist creates a necessary dialogue between the denominations in order to more deeply understand Who Christ is and what it is He intends for us.

To be fair to those who do not believe in a God, Christians defend God proclaiming a piece of bread to be His Presence amongst us as a rational claim. The claim's rationality hangs on the idea of whether or not Jesus Christ was truly God and Man, Who hung upon a cross, died for the salvation of all mankind and rose from the dead as a sign of hope for all. If Christ did not raise from the dead, the argument fails. It is important to note that the “Catholic doctrine says that Christ's sacrifice, besides being an atonement, was also a redemption – in other words, a buying back into spiritual liberty of the human race which had become the slave of evil”1 Without the belief in a Supreme Being, this argument loses its support. Belief is not a thing that can be possessed, but rather is a gift given. An assent to faith is not man-made: it can not be. Man can not give himself something he does not possess. Therefore, the argument points directly back to the idea that Christ was either God or a liar.
Therefore, holding a belief in not only a God, but the Christian God, the Eucharist begins to take on importance due to the fact that Christ Himself stated that it is entirely dependent upon man's development of a relationship between Him and God (cf. John 6:56-58). Therefore, the Eucharist comes to the forefront of the Christian question. In order to prove that transubstantiation is possible, laying out an argument that any change at all for man becomes important. In his Summa Theologiae, St. Thomas Aquinas questions, “Whether the Body of Christ be in This Sacrament in Very Truth, or Merely As in a Figure or Sign?”2 (III Q. 74, Art. 1). This serious question leads us to his reply which states, “Christ's true body and blood in this sacrament cannot be detected by sense, nor understanding, but by faith alone, which rests upon Divine authority. Hence, on Luke 22:19: 'This is My body which shall be delivered up for you,' Cyril says: 'Doubt not whether this be true; but take rather the Saviour's words with faith; for since He is the Truth, He lieth not.”3 The Scriptures do not speak of this moment solely in one Gospel, but rather it is found in multiple parts of the Gospel message. Thus, St. Cyril's claim holds very firm that if Christ is not held true to his statement, then the doubters declare Christ a liar. A god who lies is not God at all, because he would not be true (a transcendental).
Continuing with the argument, Aquinas points out that the Lord would not leave us as He stated (cf. Mk 16:8): “Yet meanwhile in our pilgrimage He does not deprive us of His bodily presence; but unites us with Himself in this sacrament through the truth of His body and blood. Hence (John 6:57) he says: 'He that eateth My flesh, and drinketh My blood, abideth in Me, and I in him.' Hence this sacrament is the sign of supreme charity, and the uplifter of our hope, from such familiar union of Christ with us.”4 Again, holding that the Lord is not a liar, a believer accepts the idea that Christ stated He would never leave us, and promises His presence amongst us. The Lord does this by means of His Sacraments. Particularly within the context of the Sacraments of Initiation, by which one becomes a full member of the Body of Christ, the Church.
Thus, man, as a soul-body composite must respond in two ways that are appropriate to him. Abbot Vonier points out St. Thomas Aquinas believes that “'the linking up which is by faith takes place through an act of the soul, while the linking up which is by the sacraments takes place through the use of external things.'”5 Vonier indicates that going through life without faith is entirely missing why Christ came in the first place. Vonier writes, “Without this contact of faith we are dead to Christ, the stream of His life passes us by without entering into us, as a rock in the midst of a river remains unaffected by the turbulent rush of waters.”6 Thus, man must respond with an assent to faith initially. Secondarily man responds to faith by deepening it by assenting to the Word of God, which reveals that “I am the Bread of Life, He Who eats of my Flesh and drinks of my Blood remains in me and I in him” (Jn 6:35). The Lord reestablishes the once lost relationship with man by coming to be with him in the Eucharist.
Pope Benedict XVI, in his Post-Synodal Apostolic Exhortation Sacramentum Caritatis, states:
Through the sacrament of the Eucharist Jesus draws the faithful into his 'hour'; he shows us the bond that he willed to establish between himself and us, between his own person and the Church. Indeed, in the sacrifice of the Cross, Christ gave birth to the Church as his Bride and his body. The Fathers of the Church often meditated on the relationship between Eve's coming forth from the side of Adam as he slept (cf. Gen 2:21-23) and the coming forth of the new Eve, the Church, from the open side of Christ sleeping in death: from Christ's pierced side, John recounts, there came forth blood and water (cf. Jn 19:34), the symbol of the sacraments.7

Echoing the ideas previously conveyed, Pope Benedict indicates that man's origins are fulfilled by Christ on the Cross. God mirror-images His act of creation by creating again a Church, which He gives life at that moment. With all humans suffering from the pains of the original sin, Christ dies on the Cross once, but it must be transmitted to all. The Sacraments provide the means to transmit God's saving Grace to the faithful. Thus, Benedict asserts, “Since the Eucharist makes present Christ's redeeming sacrifice, we must start by acknowledging that 'there is a causal influence of the Eucharist at the Church's very origins'”8. The Eucharist exists as Christ who gives himself to us and continually builds us up as his as his body. This is all found within the context of the relationship between the believer and God through the sacraments He provides.
God chooses and implements sacraments, because He knows us better than we even know ourselves. God comprehends that we are physical beings that perceive reality. Despite that all of creation points to an “other” that created or caused it. Man constantly seeks that individual without a chance to perceive it, until the incarnation: God became man, and therefore becomes tangible. Thus, St. Thomas Aquinas contends, “this belongs to Christ's love, out of which for our salvation He assumed a true body of our nature. And because it is the special feature of friendship to live together with friends, as the Philosopher says (Ethic. ix), He promises us His bodily presence as a reward, saying (Mt. 24:28) “Where the body is, there shall the eagles be gathered together”9. As the true friend, Christ has never left. He gives us the spirit to reside in our hearts, but He physically remains as well.
Other Christians support their counter claim by using Christ's words stating, “For you always have the poor with you, but you will not always have me” (Mt. 26:11). Within this context, it is clear that the Lord is speaking of His Passion to come. The relationship between Christ and the people entirely changes. This passage shows the necessity of conversion for Israel. As Christ defends St. Mary Magdalene he concludes the passage by teaching, “Truly, I say to you, wherever this gospel is preached in the whole world, what she has done will be told in memory of her” (Mt. 26:16). Our Lord shows that He provides forgiveness not only for the single prostitute, Mary Magdalene, but also the harlot Israel who lives in a state of betrayal of the covenant. The Lord comes to settle the score, and provides Himself as the door to union with God. His flesh and blood serve to be the food of the faithful according to His Words.
Most importantly, other Christians seem to ride off the cultural context of this table-fellowship of the Lord. Many Protestants present the Lord in a way that makes it seem that all Christ desired was to sit down together at a table, eat, and enjoy the company. The Lord's mission includes this aspect, but it is not the end of the whole action. Dr. Scott Hahn states, “for in the culture that extended from Jeremiah to Jesus a covenant accomplished more than any testament could. In fact, a covenant was that culture. It was the bond that constituted Israel's law, liturgy and life”10. The profundity that God establishes a covenant with Israel that creates a culture of covenant shows that with the Christ's Mission He too shares in this covenant, but now has come to reveal it more deeply. Thus, the First Letter to the Corinthians indicates that the Church was not simply a Church of Word, but of Word and Sacrament. Paul expresses that Jesus “also [took] the cup, after supper, saying, 'This cup is the new covenant in my blood. Do this, as often as you drink it, in remembrance of me'” (1 Cor. 11:25).
Covenant, a word rooted with meaning, represents a whole divine pedagogy. The Lord states His terms extremely intentionally. As good and faithful Jews, the apostles would have understood that when Christ was establishing a new covenant there would be a role, a form and a sign. The apostles would have understood full well that the Lord was presenting Himself in the same way that God presented His Messages to the Fathers of Israel. Christ exists as the High Priest, the God-Man Who is both of the Davidic Line and also as God Himself. The form of God's covenant between His People presents itself by the Church, the Body of Christ. Thirdly, pointing to the importance of this defense, the Lord makes His sign the Eucharist: God's Presence amongst and with us always.
Thus, the Lord presents Himself, within the context of His culture-religion, established by His Father. Christ does not simply make this a moment of history, but rather extends it to all of salvation history. The Lord does not limit Himself, while maintaining the free will of His beloved. Therefore, Pope Benedict points out that “God's presence in the word and his presence in the Eucharist belong together, inseparably. The eucharistic Lord is himself the living Word. Only if we are living in the sphere of God's Word can we properly comprehend and properly receive the gift of the Eucharist”11. According to the world-view of Christianity, the life of a Christian does not compartmentalize actions and participation in Church. Rather, the Christian sanctifies and brings God's Presence into the world by his/her life and can not separate themselves any longer: they are forever changed.
Although Roman Catholicism has remained true to these teachings, many Protestants, like the early Christians in the Gospel, turn away from Our Lord due to this teaching. For example, Martin Luther states, “It is real bread and real wine in which the true flesh and true blood of Christ are found, not less than as those people think who describe them as their accidents”12. Going on, Luther declares that the transubstantiation is “without foundation in Scripture and reason”13. Luther was adamant on believing that the bread was both Christ's body and bread simultaneously. Despite his attempts to be true to reason and faith, the argument stands on neither the feet of reason or faith. It cannot be found within the context of Scripture without interpretation leading in that direction. Additionally, as for its validity in faith, then it seems that Luther doubts our Lord's statement of the term “is”. When “Esse” Himself utters that it is, it simply exists as such, and that is that. Genesis indicates that God made creation from nothing and assigns it meaning. Therefore, when Christ, as the God-Man declares the bread to be His Body it is. Secondarily, if Luther is claiming that something is two things simultaneously, then one can not comprehend anything verily. Just because something does not look or taste like something, external qualities, does not mean that substantially it is not something else. As Aquinas points out well in his great prayer the Tantum Ergo, senses fail the faithful frequently. Thus, Luther, fundamentally, questions God's truth, and ironically possesses a “faith” not even rooted in Scripture itself, but rather his personal interpretation of Scripture.
Thus, as Scott Hahn professes, “The Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, and gave his flesh to be our life, Wisdom's Banquet. [Christians] live the dream of the prophets and seers, [Christians] live the promise of the divine covenant, [Christians] are given the bread of angels, whenever [the Church consumes] the Word”14. Christ has provided Himself in this form as a presence that can not be forgotten or taken advantage of. Thus, God manifests His meaning for us to be one with Him, which He accomplishes by His Sacraments. Truly, the Lord presents His intention for us to be in relation with Him so closely that we become part of His Body as His Spouse. The presence of the Blessed Sacrament is the Heart of the Church, for it is His Heart. It beats at the center of every Catholic Church and gives us life as His Body. Just as the body is contingent upon the heart for life, so too the Christian is contingent upon the Eucharist for life in the Church.















Bibliography
Aquinas, St. Thomas. Summa Theologiae. Fathers of the English Dominican Province.
Hahn, Scott. CONSUMING THE WORD. New York: Crown Publishing Group, 2013.
Lienhard, Marc. LUTHER: WITNESS TO JESUS CHRIST. Minneapolis: Augsburg Publishing House, 1982.
Ratzinger, Joseph Cardinal. God is Near Us. San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 2003.
SACRAMENTUM CARITATIS. Washington, D.C.: Libreria Editrice Vaticana, 2007.
Vonier, Abbot. A KEY TO THE DOCTRINE OF THE EUCHARIST. Bethesda: Zaccheus Press, 1925.
1 Abbot Vonier, A KEY TO THE DOCTRINE OF THE EUCHARIST, (Bethesda: Zaccheus Press, 1925).
2 St. Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologiae, (Fathers of the English Dominican Province).
3 Ibid.
4Ibid.
5 Abbot Vonier, A KEY TO THE DOCTRINE OF THE EUCHARIST, (Bethesda: Zaccheus Press, 1925).
6Ibid.
7 SACRAMENTUM CARITATIS, (Washington, D.C.: Libreria Editrice Vaticana, 2007).
8Ibid.
9 St. Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologiae, (Fathers of the English Dominican Province).
10 Scott Hahn, CONSUMING THE WORD, (New York: Crown Publishing Group, 2013).
11 Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger, God is Near Us, (San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 2003).
12 Marc Lienhard, LUTHER: WITNESS TO JESUS CHRIST, (Minneapolis: Augsburg Publishing House, 1982), 127.
13 Ibid., 127.

14 Scott Hahn, CONSUMING THE WORD, (New York: Crown Publishing Group, 2013).